Spink v. . Corning
172 N.Y. 626 | NY | 1902
Judgment affirmed, but as the court think the damages in this case are excessive and as this court cannot reverse on that *627 account or reduce the damages, the affirmance is without costs; no opinion.
Concur: PARKER, Ch. J., GRAY, BARTLETT, HAIGHT, MARTIN and CULLEN, JJ. Not voting: WERNER, J.