History
  • No items yet
midpage
Spink v. . Corning
172 N.Y. 626
NY
1902
Check Treatment

Judgment affirmed, but as the court think the damages in this case are excessive and as this court cannot reverse on that *Page 627 account or reduce the damages, the affirmance is without costs; no opinion.

Concur: PARKER, Ch. J., GRAY, BARTLETT, HAIGHT, MARTIN and CULLEN, JJ. Not voting: WERNER, J.

Case Details

Case Name: Spink v. . Corning
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Oct 31, 1902
Citation: 172 N.Y. 626
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.