History
  • No items yet
midpage
Spencer v. Wright
48 Ga. App. 126
Ga. Ct. App.
1933
Check Treatment
MacIntyre, J.

1. Ordinary hearsay testimony is wholly without probative value; and when introduced in evidence without objection, such testimony alone can not establish a fact. Eastlick v. So. Ry. Co., 116 Ga. 48.

2. Where certain hearsay testimony was introduced in evidence without objection, and the remaining evidence merely showed that at the time the piano claimed was levied on it was in the house or home occupied by the defendant in fi. fa. and the claimant, and the house was owned by the latter, the trial judge did not commit reversible error in directing a verdict for the claimant. Dean v. American Harrow Co., 112 Ga. 155; So. Mining Co. v. Brown, 107 Ga. 264, 266; Knowles v. Jordan, 61 Ga. 300; Willis v. Parker, 108 Ga. 778.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Guerry, J., concur. M. B. Eubanks, for plaintiff in error.

Case Details

Case Name: Spencer v. Wright
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Dec 18, 1933
Citation: 48 Ga. App. 126
Docket Number: 23053
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.