midpage

Spencer v. StateSpencer v. State

Nevada Supreme Court
Jun 29, 1972
6752
Reporters:
, ,
Before:
Per Curiam

OPINION

Per Curiam:

Convicted of robbery, appellant first assigns as error the district court’s refusal to change venue from Pershing County, *393 where ‍​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​​‌‌‌​‌​​‌​​‌‌​‌‌​​‌​‌​​​​​​‌‌‌‌‌​​‌​​‌‌​​​‌​​‌‌‌​​‌​‌​​​‌‌​​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​​‌​​​​‌​​‍the crime occurred, to some place where there are more members of appellant’s race. “[A] jury verdict violates the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment only if it can be shown that members of the ‍​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​​‌‌‌​‌​​‌​​‌‌​‌‌​​‌​‌​​​​​​‌‌‌‌‌​​‌​​‌‌​​​‌​​‌‌‌​​‌​‌​​​‌‌​​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​​‌​​​​‌​​‍appellant’s race were excluded systematically from jury duty.” Collins v. State, 88 Nev. 168, 170, 494 P.2d 956, 957 (1972). Here, the fact no members of appellant’s race were on the jury resulted, not from their systematic exclusion, but ‍​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​​‌‌‌​‌​​‌​​‌‌​‌‌​​‌​‌​​​​​​‌‌‌‌‌​​‌​​‌‌​​​‌​​‌‌‌​​‌​‌​​​‌‌​​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​​‌​​​​‌​​‍from appellant’s decision to commit a crime in a county where only one resides.

Appellant also contends he was denied his Sixth Amendment right to counsel at a confrontation shortly after his arrest, but before he was ‍​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​​‌‌‌​‌​​‌​​‌‌​‌‌​​‌​‌​​​​​​‌‌‌‌‌​​‌​​‌‌​​​‌​​‌‌‌​​‌​‌​​​‌‌​​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​​‌​​​​‌​​‍charged. The right he claims does not exist. Kirby v. Illinois, 406 U.S. 682, 92 S.Ct. 1877 (1972); Baker v. State, 88 Nev. 369, 498 P.2d 1310 (1972). Other assignments of error are equally without merit.

Since counsel for the appellant was appointed ‍​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​​‌‌‌​‌​​‌​​‌‌​‌‌​​‌​‌​​​​​​‌‌‌‌‌​​‌​​‌‌​​​‌​​‌‌‌​​‌​‌​​​‌‌​​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​​‌​​​​‌​​‍by the district court to handle this appeal, we direct that court to compensate counsel as provided by NRS 7.260.

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Spencer v. State
Court Name: Nevada Supreme Court
Date Published: Jun 29, 1972
Citations: 498 P.2d 1335; 88 Nev. 392; 1972 Nev. LEXIS 478; 6752
Docket Number: 6752
Court Abbreviation: Nev.
Log In