Spencer v. Stanley

74 Minn. 35 | Minn. | 1898

CANTY, J.

This is an appeal from an order denying a new trial. The paper book contains a notice of motion for a new trial, which does not state any grounds for the motion. This is fatal. See Clark v. Nelson Lumber Co., 34 Minn. 289, 25 N. W. 628.

But we will go further. The return does not show any notice of motion at all, and this is equally fatal.

The order appealed from should therefore be affirmed. So ordered.

Case Details

Case Name: Spencer v. Stanley

Court Name: Supreme Court of Minnesota

Date Published: Oct 25, 1898

Citation: 74 Minn. 35

Docket Number: Nos. 11,239—(40)

Court Abbreviation: Minn.