History
  • No items yet
midpage
Spencer v. Stanley
74 Minn. 35
Minn.
1898
Check Treatment
CANTY, J.

This is an appeal from an order denying a new trial. The paper book contains a notice of motion for a new trial, which does not state any grounds for the motion. This is fatal. See Clark v. Nelson Lumber Co., 34 Minn. 289, 25 N. W. 628.

But we will go further. The return does not show any notice of motion at all, and this is equally fatal.

*36The order appealed from should therefore be affirmed. So ordered.

Case Details

Case Name: Spencer v. Stanley
Court Name: Supreme Court of Minnesota
Date Published: Oct 25, 1898
Citation: 74 Minn. 35
Docket Number: Nos. 11,239—(40)
Court Abbreviation: Minn.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.