midpage

Spencer v. EasterSpencer v. Easter

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
May 20, 2003
02-7722
Versions:63 F. App'x 160

Micheal Lee Spencer, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Michael Eugene Ornoff, Ornoff & Arnold, P.C., Virginia Beach, VA; Philip Carlton Hollowell, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, VA, for Appellees.

Before LUTTIG and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Micheal Lee Spencer, Sr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Spencer v. Easter, No. CA-01-1579-AM (E.D. Va. filed Oct. 24, 2002 & entered Oct. 25, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case Details

Case Name: Spencer v. Easter
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: May 20, 2003
Citations: 63 F. App'x 160; 02-7722
Docket Number: 02-7722
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
Log In