In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Winslow, J.), dated April 19, 2006, as, in effect, granted those branches of the separate motions of the defendants Dexter Shoe Co. and Herrill Bowling Corp., doing business as Herrill Lanes, which were for summary judgment dismissing the cause of action sounding in strict products liability insofar as asserted against them and, upon searching the record, awarded summary judgment dismissing that cause of action insofar as asserted against the defendant Fat’s Frofessional Shop.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs.
Dexter, Herrill Lanes, and Pat’s were entitled to summary judgment dismissing the cause of action sounding in strict products liability. The evidence submitted by Dexter made out a prima facie case demonstrating that, as a matter of law, the bowling shoe was not defective. In response, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see Castro v Delta Intl. Mach. Corp., 309 AD2d 827, 828 [2003]; see generally Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 324 [1986]). Rivera, J.R, Florio, Fisher and Dillon, JJ., concur.
