History
  • No items yet
midpage
Spector v. Puglisi
9 Misc. 2d 250
N.Y. App. Term.
1957
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

In this action for personal injuries, plaintiff seeks a recovery from the owner of real property for his alleged negligence in failing to clean the public sidewalk in front of his property after receiving notice that strawberries and vegetable leaves had been strewn thereon. It clearly appears from the evidence that this condition was created by someone other than defendant owner. Absent any proof to connect this defendant with the person who was initially responsible for such condition, plaintiff failed to establish any basis for liability herein (Frank v. Muller, 200 App. Div. 639, affd. 235 N. Y. 540). The duty to clean the sidewalk imposed on an owner of real property by section 755 (3)-2.0 of the Administrative Code of the City of New York is enforcible only at the instance of the city (City of Rochester v. Campbell, 123 N. Y. 405; Troeger v. Prudential Ins. Co. of America, 154 Misc. 537).

The judgment should be unanimously reversed on the law, with costs to defendant-appellant and complaint dismissed with costs.

Pette, Habt and Di Gtovanna, JJ., concur.

Judgment reversed, etc.

Case Details

Case Name: Spector v. Puglisi
Court Name: Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Date Published: Oct 25, 1957
Citation: 9 Misc. 2d 250
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Term.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.