Spears' Administrator v. Greer

178 Ky. 246 | Ky. Ct. App. | 1917

Opinion of the Court by

William Eogers Olay, Commissioner

Affirming.

At the May, 1890 term of the Johnson circuit court, W. W. Greer was appointed as committee for two idiots, Mary E. Spears and her daughter, Mary A. Spears. He acted as committee for Mary E. Spears until her death in. December, 1903, and as committee for Mary A. Spears-until the October, 1904, term of the Johnson circuit court, when Geo. B. Eice was appointed committee in his stead. During those periods, with the exception of 14 months-when no allowance was made because proper inquests had not been held, Greer regularly received, first from the county and state and thereafter from the state alone, the sum of $75.00 per-annum for the maintenance of each. It further appears that Greer was appointed committee on the request of Charley Fitzpatrick, the son-in-law of Mary E. Spears, and the brother-in-law of Mary A. Spears, who could not be appointed because of his inability to give proper bond. After Greer’s appointment* lie employed Fitzpatrick to take charge of the idiots, and with the exception of the period above referred to, paid him regularly' the sum of $65.00 pér annum for the maintenance of each, and retained the balance under an.árrangémént with .Fitzpatrick., During that time he paid certain costs incident to the inquests,, and furnished certain supplies to Fitzpatrick. He also performed certain legal services for Fitzpatrick. .Upon their final settlement, Fitzpatrick was indebted to him in the sum of $60.00, for which he executed a note.

This suit was brought by Rice' in his fiduciary capacity as committee' for Mary A., Spears, to recover of Greer the balancé in his hánds which had not been appropriated' to her maintenance, and in his individual capacity, to recover of Greer, the amount of his bill for supplies furnished the idiots during the period when no allowance was made by the State, on the ground that Greer was liable therefor, because of.his negligence in .failing, to have proper inquests held. During the progress of the suit, Mary A. Spears died. Thereupon, Rice qualified as administrator for both Mary A. Spears and Mary E. Spears, and the- suit was thereafter revived in his name as administrator.

. Upon the filing of the original petition, the trial court required1 Greer to elect which cause of action he would prosecute, and he elected to proceed in his capacity as committee. Thereupon his cause of action in his individual capacity was dismissed without prejudice. Thereafter proof was taken and on final hearing the petition was dismissed. From this judgment, Rice, individually and as administrator, has' asked 'that an appeal be granted. ' ' •

The action of the trial court in requiring Greer to elect whether he would proceed in his individual capacity or in his capacity as committee was proper, and since he elected to proceed in his fiduciary capacity, it follows that his personal cause of action is eliminated from consideration.

The statute provides for an' allowance of $75.00 per annum to each pauper idiot to be paid out of the State treasury to the committee of such idiot. Ky. Statutes, section 364. There is no statute providing for the payment out of this allowance of court costs or of compensation or commissions to the committee. It was not contemplated that the allowance should be made a source of profit to the committee or anyone else. On the contrary, it-was 'intended by the legislature that these unfortünat'és should receive the benefit'ofi every-dollar allowed. That being true, it is the duty of the committee to see that the allowance is expended for the sole and exclusive purpose of furnishing to such idiots, suitable food, clothing, shelter, medical attention, and other necessaries. It is the'further duty of such committee to- make-regular settlements with the court. If, upon any such settlement, it should be made to appear that the allowance made for the previous year was more than' sufficient to pay for the idiot’s proper maintenance and there is a balance in the.hands of the committee, this fact should be certified to. the auditor, and the allowance for the succeeding year should-be diminished by the amount of such balance. Since the committee is not entitled to any commission, he has ho right to retain any of the allowance for his personal benefit and there can be no question that a subsequently appointed committee may recover from a former committee, during the lifetime of the idiot, any sums not expended for the idiot’s benefit, but illegally retained by the committee. In'this event, however, the sums so recovered will not become the property of the idiot to be disposed of by the committee as he’ sees fit, but should be used solely for the maintenance of the idiot, and no allowance should be requested from the state until such sums are exhausted.

However, since the allowance by the state is made solely for the maintenance of the idiot, it necessarily follows that the allowance can be no longer applied to that purpose when the idiot is dead. For this reason, money illegally retained by a committee, can not be regarded on the death of the idiot, as assets of his estate to be administered for the benefit of his heirs or creditors. That being true, no cause of action exists in favor of the idiot’s administrator against the former committee, but only in favor of the state whose money has been diverted from the purpose for which it was appropriated. Since both idiots were dead before the final hearing of this case, it follows that the petition of Eice, as administrator, was properly dismissed.

In view of the importance of the question, the appealis ¿’ranted, an opinion written, and the mdgment affirmed.