History
  • No items yet
midpage
Spaulding v. Baker
222 A.D. 707
N.Y. App. Div.
1927
Check Treatment

Order and judgment reversed on the law, with costs, and verdict reinstated, with costs, on the ground that the questions whether the facts imputed negligence or contributory negligence were for the jury. (See Thomas Neg. [2d ed.] 673.) Cochrane, P. J., Van Kirk, Hinman, McCann and Whitmyer, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Spaulding v. Baker
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Nov 15, 1927
Citation: 222 A.D. 707
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.