2 Doug. 150 | Mich. | 1845
delivered the opinion of the Court.
A levy on real estate is not, as is a levy on personal property, a prima facie satisfaction.
The errors complained of being mere irregularities, should have been taken advantage of in due time by motion. Here the motion was made in January, 1845 ; the sale was in 1840. The motion comes too late.
Motion denied.
As to how far a levy on personal property is to he deemed a satisfaction of tho debt, see Farmers and Mechanics' Bank v. Kingsley, post.