Sovereign Camp, W. O. W. v. Daniel
228 Ala. 699
| Ala. | 1934

The undisputed facts of this case show that it is controlled by our cases of Higgins v. Sovereign Camp, W. O. W., 224 Ala. 644,141 So. 562; Sovereign Camp, W. O. W., v. Batty, 227 Ala. 50,148 So. 811; Sovereign Camp, W. O. W., v. Harden, 227 Ala. 700,150 So. 921.

No ruling assigned by appellant was prejudicial when so considered. The judgment is affirmed on the authority of those cases.

Affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J. and GARDNER and BOULDIN, JJ., concur.