History
  • No items yet
midpage
Southern v. State
35 Ga. App. 659
Ga. Ct. App.
1926
Check Treatment
Luke, J.

The conviction of the offense of larceny was amply authorized by the evidence. The special assignments of error, complaining of the court’s refusal to continue his ease and upon the court’s rulings upon the admissibility of evidence, are without merit. The plaintiff in error has had a legal trial, and for no reason pointed out in the record did the court err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Bloodioorlh, J., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Southern v. State
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Aug 4, 1926
Citation: 35 Ga. App. 659
Docket Number: 17443
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.