History
  • No items yet
midpage
Southern Ry. Co. v. Moore
284 U.S. 581
SCOTUS
1931
Check Treatment
Per Curiam:

The judgment herein is reversed, upon the ground, as matter of law, that the evidence is not sufficient to sustain a finding that negligence of the petitioner was the cause of the death of respondent’s intestate.' Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Ry. Co. v. Coogan, 271 *582U. S. 472, 474, 478; Atlantic Coast Line v. Driggers, 279 U. S. 787, 788; Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Ry. Co. v. Toops, 281 U. S. 351, 354-355.

Messrs. S. R. Prince, H. O’B. Cooper, Frank G. Tompkins, and L. E. Jeffries were on the brief for petitioner. Mr. Wm. C. Wolfe was on the brief for respondent. See 161 S. E. 525.

Case Details

Case Name: Southern Ry. Co. v. Moore
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Nov 2, 1931
Citation: 284 U.S. 581
Docket Number: No. 45
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.