History
  • No items yet
midpage
Southern Railway Co. v. Pulliam
34 S.E. 147
Ga.
1899
Check Treatment
Cobb, J.

1. The evidence claimed to have been newly discovered being cumulative on points directly under investigation at the trial, as well as impeaching, and being such as could have been easily discovered by the exercise of the very slightest diligence, it was not of such a character as to authorize the granting of a new trial.

2. No error of law was complained of. The evidence authorized the verdict, and the court did not err in refusing to grant a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

AU the Justices concurring.

Case Details

Case Name: Southern Railway Co. v. Pulliam
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Jul 27, 1899
Citation: 34 S.E. 147
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.