Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance v. Liberty Mutual Insurance, No. 8278

Read

Notebook

No. 8278 | La. Ct. App. | Aug 13, 1981

Lead Opinion

STOKER, Judge.

For the reasons stated in the companion case of Hardy v. State of Louisiana, Department of Highways, 404 So. 2d 981" court="La. Ct. App." date_filed="1981-08-13" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/hardy-v-state-through-dept-of-highways-1958163?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="1958163">404 So.2d 981 (La.App. 3rd Cir. 1981), in which a sepa*996rate opinion is being rendered this date, the judgment of the trial court in this case is affirmed in all respects except as to its holding relative to the City of Natchitoches and Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company. As to them the judgment of the trial court is reversed. The City of Natchitoches and Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company are now cast in judgment in solido with the State of Louisiana, Department of Transportation and Development, and the judgment is amended accordingly.

The cost of the appeal in this case is assessed one-half to the State and one-half to the City of Natchitoches and Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company.

REVERSED IN PART AND AMENDED; AFFIRMED AS AMENDED.

Rehearing

ON APPLICATION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

In this and the companion cases with which it is consolidated the State of Louisiana, Department of Transportation and Development, the City of Natchitoches and Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company have applied for a rehearing.

We amend our judgment rendered on original hearing in conformity with the per curiam attached to the opinion in Hardy, et al v. State of Louisiana, Through Department of Highways, et al, 404 So. 2d 981" court="La. Ct. App." date_filed="1981-08-13" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/hardy-v-state-through-dept-of-highways-1958163?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="1958163">404 So. 2d 981 (La.App. 3rd Cir. 1981), so as to give effect to the limits of liability set forth in the policy of Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company. Any recovery by plaintiff herein against Hartford shall be subject to apportionment as provided by law.

APPLICATIONS FOR REHEARING DENIED.