History
  • No items yet
midpage
Southern Express Co. v. Rothenberg
40 So. 65
Miss.
1905
Check Treatment
Whiteield, O. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The principles which make the action of the court below correct in this case have long been settled. The stipulations in the contract that the negligence of the railroad company could not be imputed to the express company, and that the liability of the express company should be only fifty dollars, no matter how great the value of the package lost, are both in plain violation of the public policy of this state. Telegraph Co. v. Wells, 82 Miss., 733 (35 South. Rep., 190); Hughes v. Pa. R. R. Co. (Pa.), 97 Am. St. Rep., 713, and note; Bank of Kentucky v. Adams Express Co., 93 U. S., 174 (23 L. ed., 872). See, specially, the note to Chicago, etc., R. R. Co. v. Calumet, etc., Farm (Ill.), 88 Am. St. Rep., 101.

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Southern Express Co. v. Rothenberg
Court Name: Mississippi Supreme Court
Date Published: Nov 15, 1905
Citation: 40 So. 65
Court Abbreviation: Miss.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.