History
  • No items yet
midpage
Southern Express Co. v. Hunt
54 Miss. 664
Miss.
1877
Check Treatment
Chalmeks, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The judgment by default was improper. The act of March 4, 1873 (Acts 1873, p. 82), only authorizes service of process against express, railroad and telegraph companies to be made *666upon local agents of the corporation “if the president or other principal officers of said corporation cannot be found in the county in which suit is brought.” It is apparent, therefore, that the president or other principal officer is the party primarily to be served, and that the impossibility of finding him in the county is a condition precedent to the right to serve on the local agent. The officer, therefore, who executes the writ upon a local agent must state in his return that the principal cannot be found, just as is requisite in serving a writ upon a wife or other member of the family in the absence of the defendant husband. Foster v. Simmons, 40 Miss. 585; Mullins v. Sparks, 48 Miss. 129.

It was error also to overrule the motion to set aside the judgment by default upon the showing made. It should have been granted upon terms to be fixed by the court. Fore v. Folsom, 4 How. (Miss.) 282; City of Meridian v. Trussell, 52 Miss. 711.

Judgment reversed and cause remanded.

Case Details

Case Name: Southern Express Co. v. Hunt
Court Name: Mississippi Supreme Court
Date Published: Oct 15, 1877
Citation: 54 Miss. 664
Court Abbreviation: Miss.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.