| N.Y. App. Div. | Nov 13, 1956
Order denying plaintiff’s motion to direct defendant to answer questions put to him on an examination before trial or for alternative relief, unanimously affirmed. Concur — Peek, P. J., Botein, Rabin, Cox and Valente, JJ. [208 Misc. 846" date_filed="1955-06-15" court="N.Y. Sup. Ct." case_name="Southbridge Finishing Co. v. Golding">208 Misc. 846.]