History
  • No items yet
midpage
Soule v. . Bon Ami Company
139 N.E. 754
NY
1923
Check Treatment

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur:- Hogan, and McLaughlin, JJ.; Cardozo, Pound, Crane and Andrews, JJ., concur on ground plaintiff failed to prove profits resulting from change of plans. Absent: His cock, Ch.-J.

Case Details

Case Name: Soule v. . Bon Ami Company
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Apr 17, 1923
Citation: 139 N.E. 754
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.