Soon Duck Kim v. City of New YorkSoon Duck Kim v. City of New York
—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for the alleged taking of property for public use without just compensation, the plaintiffs Soon Duck Kim, Man Suk Jun, and In Myung Jun appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Di Tucci, J.), dated March 20, 1992, which denied their motion for partial summary judgment on the second cause of action in the complaint and granted the cross motion of the defendant City of New York for summary judgment dismissing the second cause of action.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court properly found that the placement of side fill on a portion of the plaintiffs’ property to support the elevated grade of the abutting street did not effect a "taking” requiring the payment of "just compensation” (see, US Const 5th, 14th Amends; NY Const, art I, § 7 [a]). Contrary to the plaintiffs’ contention, the placement of the fill did not constitute a "permanent physical occupation” of their property by the defendant City of New York. Not every physical invasion of property is a "permanent physical occupation” (Loretto v Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.,