midpage

Songer v. WalkerSonger v. Walker

Indiana Supreme Court
May 14, 1823
Reporters:
,

The plaintiffs in the Court below might have had this judgment amended ‍‌‌‌​​‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​​​​‌‌​‌​​​​​​‌​​​‌​​​​‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​​‌​‌​​‌‌‌​​​​‌‌​​​​‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‍there, on motion, even after a transcript of the record had been transmitted to this Court, They could then have alleged a ‍‌‌‌​​‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​​​​‌‌​‌​​​​​​‌​​​‌​​​​‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​​‌​‌​​‌‌‌​​​​‌‌​​​​‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‍diminution, had a transcript of the amended record brought up by a writ of certiorari, and have thus prevented a reversal of- the ‍‌‌‌​​‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​​​​‌‌​‌​​​​​​‌​​​‌​​​​‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​​‌​‌​​‌‌‌​​​​‌‌​​​​‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‍judgment. Short v. Coffin, 5 Burr. 2730. And the mistake, being in the form of the judgment, might have been amended at a term subsequent to that ‍‌‌‌​​‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​​​​‌‌​‌​​​​​​‌​​​‌​​​​‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​​‌​‌​​‌‌‌​​​​‌‌​​​​‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‍in which tho judgment was rendered. Per Heath, J. in Burroughs v. Stevens, 5 Taunt. 554. Vide also Usher v. Dansey, 4 Maule Selw. 94. — Richardson v. Mellish, 3 Bing. 334. — Lambert v. Blackman, ‍‌‌‌​​‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​​​​‌‌​‌​​​​​​‌​​​‌​​​​‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​​‌​‌​​‌‌‌​​​​‌‌​​​​‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‍ante., p. 69, and note 2. — Fite v. Doe, ante, p. 127, 132.

Case Details

Case Name: Songer v. Walker
Court Name: Indiana Supreme Court
Date Published: May 14, 1823
Citations: 1 Blackf. 251; 1823 Ind. LEXIS 10
Court Abbreviation: Ind.
Log In