History
  • No items yet
midpage
Songer v. Walker
1 Blackf. 251
Ind.
1823
Check Treatment

The plaintiffs in the Court below might have had this judgment amended there, on motion, even after a transcript of the record had been transmitted to this Court, They could then have alleged a diminution, had a transcript of the amended record brought up by a writ of certiorari, and have thus prevented a reversal of- the judgment. Short v. Coffin, 5 Burr. 2730. And the mistake, being in the form of the judgment, might have been amended at a term subsequent to that in which tho judgment was rendered. Per Heath, J. in Burroughs v. Stevens, 5 Taunt. 554. Vide also Usher v. Dansey, 4 Maule Selw. 94. — Richardson v. Mellish, 3 Bing. 334. — Lambert v. Blackman, ante., p. 69, and note 2. — Fite v. Doe, ante, p. 127, 132.

Case Details

Case Name: Songer v. Walker
Court Name: Indiana Supreme Court
Date Published: May 14, 1823
Citation: 1 Blackf. 251
Court Abbreviation: Ind.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.