History
  • No items yet
midpage
Sommella v. Roach
59 N.Y.2d 622
NY
1983
Check Treatment

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed, with costs. We agree with the Appellate Division that there have not been shown facts sufficient to require a trial of the claim that John Holze disconnected the rope marker in the swimming pool (CPLR 3212, subd [b]).

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg, Meyer and Simons.

Case Details

Case Name: Sommella v. Roach
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Apr 26, 1983
Citation: 59 N.Y.2d 622
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.