History
  • No items yet
midpage
Somerville v. Acacia Mut. Life Ins.
149 F.2d 836
D.C. Cir.
1945
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

One part of the language on which the plaintiff relied in this action for libel was incapable of a defamatory meaning. The other part was obviously true. Regardless of the defense of privilege, therefore, the District Court was right in directing a verdict for the defendant. Meyerson v. Hurlbut, 68 App.D.C. 360, 362, 98 F.2d 232, 118 A.L.R. 313; Sullivan v. Meyer, 67 App. D.C. 228, 91 F.2d 301; cf. Sullivan v. Meyer, 78 U.S.App.D.C. 367, 141 F.2d 21.

Affirmed

Case Details

Case Name: Somerville v. Acacia Mut. Life Ins.
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Date Published: Jun 4, 1945
Citation: 149 F.2d 836
Docket Number: No. 8864
Court Abbreviation: D.C. Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.