midpage

Solomon v. Tupelo Compress Co.Solomon v. Tupelo Compress Co.

Mississippi Supreme Court
Mar 15, 1893
Versions:
Campbell, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

If it be held that Solomon appeared and pleaded, no other *825question need be considered. That the plea put in must be held an appearance for Solomon we have no doubt. If judgment by default had been given against Solomon, and he had appealed from that, it would certainly be held that the judgment was wrong.

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Solomon v. Tupelo Compress Co.
Court Name: Mississippi Supreme Court
Date Published: Mar 15, 1893
Citation: 70 Miss. 822
Court Abbreviation: Miss.
Log In