History
  • No items yet
midpage
Solomon v. State
90 S.E. 488
Ga. Ct. App.
1916
Check Treatment
Broyles, J.

1. The evidence authorized the jury to find that the principal witness for the prosecution was not an accomplice of the defendant. Therefore, in order legally to convict the accused, corroboration of the testimony of this witness was not necessary.

2. Under the facts of the case there is no merit in any of the grounds of the amendment to the motion for a new trial.

3. The evidence'authorized the verdict, and the court did not err in refusing to grant a new trial. Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Solomon v. State
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Oct 31, 1916
Citation: 90 S.E. 488
Docket Number: 7705
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.