History
  • No items yet
midpage
Solomon v. South Carolina
382 U.S. 204
SCOTUS
1966
Check Treatment

SOLOMON v. SOUTH CAROLINA

No. 588

Supreme Court of the United States

December 6, 1965

204

Ellis Lyons for appellant.

Daniel R. McLeod, Attorney General of South Carolina, and E. N. Brandon, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that the judgment should be reversed on the authority of

Sherbert v. Verner, 374 U. S. 398. And see
McGowan v. Maryland, 366 U. S. 420, 561, 577
(dissenting opinion).

MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN and MR. JUSTICE STEWART are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Case Details

Case Name: Solomon v. South Carolina
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Jan 17, 1966
Citation: 382 U.S. 204
Docket Number: 588
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.