History
  • No items yet
midpage
Sol D. Maizels v. George Van Hoomissen, District Attorney for Multnomah County, Oregon
429 F.2d 982
9th Cir.
1970
Check Treatment

Lead Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Upon the authority of Demich, Inc. v. Ferdon, 426 F.2d 643 (9th Cir. 1970), the order for the return of the seized films is affirmed.

Since acquiescence with our decision can, we feel, be assumed until the contrary appears, the case is remanded with instructions that the injunction against future seizures be vacated.






Concurrence Opinion

CHAMBERS, Circuit Judge

(concurring) :

This is more dirty pictures business. Obviously the police cannot be permitted to proceed in terrorem. But it would seem that a magistrate could invent a hearing to show cause why a search warrant should not issue. Then the magistrate could look at the film before issuing his warrant. Also, courts must have the necessary injunctive powers to prevent destruction or disappearance of the film by hit and run producers, assuming that a prosecution is contemplated.

Case Details

Case Name: Sol D. Maizels v. George Van Hoomissen, District Attorney for Multnomah County, Oregon
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Date Published: Sep 14, 1970
Citation: 429 F.2d 982
Docket Number: 25562_1
Court Abbreviation: 9th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.