History
  • No items yet
midpage
Sol A. Dann, John H. Neville and Louise A. Turek v. Studebaker-Packard Corporation, Harold E. Churchill, Hugh J. Ferry and A. J. Porta
253 F.2d 28
6th Cir.
1958
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

It appearing to the Court from the record, the briefs and the oral argument of the parties that, as appellees concede, the order of the District Court dismissing appellants’ complaint as amended and supplemented, for non-compliance with Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., was not a dismissal of the action and is not appeal-able, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and that appellants may yet file, by leave of Court pursuant to Rule 15, an amended complaint which will meet the requirements of Rule 8;

It is ordered that the appeal is hereby dismissed and the cause remanded for further proceedings.

Case Details

Case Name: Sol A. Dann, John H. Neville and Louise A. Turek v. Studebaker-Packard Corporation, Harold E. Churchill, Hugh J. Ferry and A. J. Porta
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Date Published: Feb 20, 1958
Citation: 253 F.2d 28
Docket Number: 13270_1
Court Abbreviation: 6th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.