216 A.D. 573 | N.Y. App. Div. | 1926
The claimant is suffering from a disorder, known as dermatitis, which disables him in respect to the use of his hands. He seeks compensation on the ground that he suffers from an occupational disease within the provisions of section 3, subdivision 2, group 8, of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. The first clause of that subdivision reads “ compensation shall be payable for disabilities sustained or death incurred by an employee resulting from the following occupational diseases.” The clause is immediately followed by two parallel columns, the first of which is entitled, “ Description of diseases,” and the second, “ Description of process.” Under the first heading there appear nineteen different diseases, and under the second, nineteen different processes. The arrangement of the words of the subdivision are such that we take its meaning to be that an employee, in order to be entitled to recover, must suffer from a disease named in the first column and also must have contracted such disease while engaged in a process, involving the use of an element, the name of which is given in the second column in a line set opposite to the line containing the name of the disease. Thus, the claimant contends that he suffers from aniline poisoning. We find under column 1 a form of disease which is numbered “ 8 ” and is thus described: “ Poisoning
The award should be reversed and the claim dismissed, with costs against the State Industrial Board.
All concur.
Award reversed and claim dismissed, with costs against the State Industrial Board.