History
  • No items yet
midpage
Sochefsky v. Dinowitz
200 A.D. 878
| N.Y. App. Div. | 1922
|
Check Treatment

Judgment and order reversed and a new trial granted, without costs, on the ground that the apparent finding by the jury that the defendant C. N. & J. Corporation was responsible for the alleged conversion of the plaintiff’s property was against the weight of the evidence, and on the further ground that the apparent finding of the jury that the other defendants were not responsible for the alleged conversion is likewise against the weight of the evidence. Blackmar, P. J., Rich, Kelly, Kelby and Young, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Sochefsky v. Dinowitz
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Jan 15, 1922
Citation: 200 A.D. 878
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.