midpage

Snow v. StateSnow v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida
Apr 26, 1984
No. 83-828
Versions:448 So. 2d 1246
1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12954
COBB, Judge.

What mighty contests rise from trivial things!1 The sole issue on appeal is whether the lower court erred by assessing upon the defendant, adjudged insolvent, a five percent fine surcharge and court costs of $11.50. The surcharge is affirmed. See § 960.25, Fla.Stat. (1981); State v. Champe, 373 So.2d 874 (Fla.1978); Nash v. State, 434 So.2d 33 (Fla. 2d DCA), review denied, 438 So.2d 833 (Fla.1983). The record does not reflect that the lower court assessed court costs pursuant to section 27.56, Florida Statutes (1981); therefore, the assessment is STRICKEN. Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla.1984); Anderson v. State, 415 So.2d 49 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982). In all other respects, the judgment and sentence are AFFIRMED.

FRANK D. UPCHURCH, Jr. and SHARP, JJ., concur.

Notes

. Alexander Pope, The Rape of the Lock (1712). 448So.2d — 28

Case Details

Case Name: Snow v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Apr 26, 1984
Citations: 448 So. 2d 1246; 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12954; No. 83-828
Docket Number: No. 83-828
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
Log In