History
  • No items yet
midpage
Snow v. Frye
34 Okla. 826
Okla.
1912
Check Treatment

This appeal was filed January 3, 1911. Plaintiffs in error have filed no brief, nor has any excuse been offered for their failure to do so. It is evident that the proceedings have been abandoned. The appeal should, therefore, be dismissd for want of prosecution under rule 7 (20 Okla. viii, 95 Pac. vi) of this court. Hass v. McCampbell, 27 Okla. 290, 111 P. 543; Maddinv. McCormick, 27 Okla. 779, 117 P. 200; Bender v. Bender etal., 30 Okla. 288, 119 P. 205; Cox v. Rogers, 30 Okla. 296,119 P. 205; McClelland v. Witherall, 30 Okla. 287,119 P. 205.

By the Court: It is so ordered. *Page 827

Case Details

Case Name: Snow v. Frye
Court Name: Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Date Published: Oct 15, 1912
Citation: 34 Okla. 826
Docket Number: 2231
Court Abbreviation: Okla.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.