Snead v. United States, Nos. 4465, 4466

Nos. 4465, 4466 | D.C. | Dec 27, 1967

PER CURIAM:

Appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support his convictions of assault¹ and of possession of a prohibited weapon.² He was given concurrent sentences of 180 days for assault and 60 days for possession of a prohibited weapon.

The determinations of guilt in this case rest upon the resolution of factual issues presented in the testimony before the court. A review of the record convinces us that the evidence is clearly sufficient to support the conviction for assault. And although the evidence does not support the conviction of possession of a prohibited weapon, we find no error in view of the concurrent sentences imposed.³

Affirmed.

1 . D.C.Code 1967, § 22-504.

2 . D.C.Code 1967, § 22-3214 (b).

3 . Reed v. United States, D.C.App., 210 A.2d 845" court="D.C." date_filed="1965-06-16" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/reed-v-united-states-2330006?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="2330006">210 A.2d 845 (1965); Pollen v. United States, D.C.App., 207 A.2d 114" court="D.C." date_filed="1965-02-19" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/pollen-v-united-states-2402475?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="2402475">207 A.2d 114 (1965).