midpage

Smoke v. StateSmoke v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama
Dec 15, 1888
Reporters:
Before:
Somerville
SOMERVILLE, J.

Tbe indictment, in our opinion, was bad, in failing to aver with sufficient clearness tbe ownership of tbe “cotton-bouse,” or “cotton-pen,” alleged to have been set fire to, or burned. — Crim. Code, 1888, § 3781. Each of tbe four counts must be construed to aver only tbe ownership of tbe cotton contained in tbe bouse or pen, and not of tbe structure itself which contained tbe cotton.

The demurrer should have been sustained, and it was error to overrule it.

Tbe judgment will be reversed, and tbe usual order made for bolding tbe defendant in custody until legally discharged.

Reversed and remanded.

Case Details

Case Name: Smoke v. State
Court Name: Supreme Court of Alabama
Date Published: Dec 15, 1888
Citation: 87 Ala. 143
Court Abbreviation: Ala.
Log In