409 Pa. 217 | Pa. | 1962
Opinion by
The plaintiff in this action in equity is a Virginia corporation operating a trucking terminal in the City of Philadelphia. On all dates relevant, a valid collective bargaining contract existed between the plaintiff, as employer, and the Teamsters Union, Local No. 107, the authorized bargaining agent for its employees.
. The court below was without jurisdiction to enter that portion of the order complained of. The merits of the dispute involved as to whether or not these employees may be disciplined by the employer is a matter within the exclusive legal jurisdiction of the
If the plaintiff-employer sought equitable relief without obedience to the maxim that he who comes into equity must do so with clean hands, the chancellor should have denied the relief prayed for. He had no legal authority to adjudicate additional matters which were beyond his jurisdiction.
The case of Sley System Garages v. Transport Workers Union of America, 406 Pa. 370, 178 A. 2d 560 (1962), is clearly inapposite and must be restricted to its own peculiar facts.
Decree as modified is affirmed. Costs to be paid by the appellees.
These individuals are members of Local No. 107 of the Teamsters Union but are affiliated with the Voice of the Teamsters Democratic Organizing Committee, which actively seeks to represent the employees of the plaintiff and other employers for collective bargaining purposes. The “Voice” represents a group within the union local, who are in opposition to the present officials thereof and the manner in which it is operated.
The court below concluded that the employer was unfairly discriminatory against the employees for lawful activities and, therefore, did not come into equity with clean hands.