History
  • No items yet
midpage
Smith v. Young
268 A.D. 863
N.Y. App. Div.
1944
Check Treatment

Motion referred to the court that rendered the decision. Present — Close, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Lewis and Aldrich, JJ. Motion for reargument granted and on reargument the decision of this court dated June 26, 1944 [ante, p. 801], is amended *864by adding to the second sentence, after the word. “ compensation,” the following : “ and also without prejudice to a renewal of the motion to examine defendants before trial, upon a proper showing of the facts constituting the fraud perpetrated upon the attorney.” The order is resettled accordingly. Present — Close, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Lewis, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: Smith v. Young
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Oct 2, 1944
Citation: 268 A.D. 863
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.