Smith v. WoodSmith v. Wood
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The Family Court properly denied as untimely the father‘s written objections to the Support Magistrate‘s order (see
Insofar as the father‘s brief on appeal raises issues not previously raised in the Family Court, these matters are not properly before this Court (see Creighton v Creighton, 222 AD2d 740, 743 [1995]).
Mastro, J.P., Fisher, Angiolillo and McCarthy, JJ., concur.