Smith v. State

675 So. 2d 1050 | Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | 1996

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

This court withdraws its per curiam affir-mance of May 15, 1996 and substitutes the following opinion.

The court affirms the conviction of defendant, but strikes that portion of the final judgment which assesses prospective appellate costs. See Davis v. State, 641 So.2d 972 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994).

KLEIN, PARIENTE and GROSS, JJ., concur.