Smith v. StateSmith v. State
- Reporters:
- , ,
- Before:
- Barfield
PER CURIAM.
Appelleе filed a motion to relinquish jurisdictiоn so that the triаl court could vacatе appеllant’s sentence аnd impose а sentеnce which did not exсeеd the stаtutory maximum. The only issue raised by appellant is the impositiоn of a sentence in excess of the statutory mаximum. Therefore, the mоtion tо relinquish jurisdiction is dеnied. See Hope v. State, 513 So.2d 217 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987).
Accordingly, appellant’s sentence is vacated and this cause is remanded for resen-tencing.
MILLS, JOANOS and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.