Smith v. State, 495 So. 2d 876

PER CURIAM.

None of the reasons for departing from the presumptive guideline sentence given by the lower court in this case presents a valid basis for departure. See Scurry v. State, 489 So.2d 25 (Fla.1986); Dixon v. State, 492 So.2d 410 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986) and Kirk v. State, 490 So.2d 176 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986). Thus, this case is remanded for resentencing within the presumptive guideline range.

REMANDED.

ORFINGER, COBB and COWART, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Smith v. State

Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida

Date Published: Oct 9, 1986

Citations: 495 So. 2d 876; 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10038; No. 86-552

Docket Number: No. 86-552

Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.