midpage

Smith v. StateSmith v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida
May 6, 1981
No. 80-1810
Versions:400 So. 2d 27
1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19687
PER CURIAM.

We accept the reasoning of our sister court in Norman v. State, 388 So.2d 613 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980) that the automatic standing rule has not become a part of this state’s law in order to survive the overruling of Jones v. United States, 362 U.S. 257, *2880 S.Ct. 725, 4 L.Ed.2d 697 (1960) by the United States Supreme Court in United States v. Salvucci, 448 U.S. 83, 100 S.Ct. 2547, 65 L.Ed.2d 619 (1980) and Rawlings v. Kentucky, 448 U.S. 98, 100 S.Ct. 2556, 65 L.Ed.2d 633 (1980). Therefore, we affirm.

HOBSON, Acting C. J., and GRIMES and RYDER, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Smith v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: May 6, 1981
Citations: 400 So. 2d 27; 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19687; No. 80-1810
Docket Number: No. 80-1810
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
Log In