History
  • No items yet
midpage
Smith v. State
198 So. 2d 827
Fla.
1967
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

By petition for certiorari we are requested to review a decision of the District Court of Appeal, Second District, in Smith v. State, 184 So.2d 458.

The petition has been lodged in this Court eighty-three days after the entry of the decision sought to be reviewed. The petition is therefore not timely filed and must be dismissed sua sponte.

An examination of the claims asserted by the petitioner suggest potential merit. The petition is therefore dismissed, but without prejudice to the petitioner to renew his motion in the trial court under Criminal Procedure Rule No. 1, F.S.A. ch. 924 Appendix, and thereby to assert any rights available to him under our decision in Smith v. State, Fla., 197 So.2d 497, opinion filed April 12th, 1967.

It is so ordered.

THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, O’CONNELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Smith v. State
Court Name: Supreme Court of Florida
Date Published: May 17, 1967
Citation: 198 So. 2d 827
Docket Number: No. 35463
Court Abbreviation: Fla.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.