History
  • No items yet
midpage
Smith v. State
539 S.W.3d 931
| Mo. Ct. App. | 2018
|
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

*932Elvis C. Smith appeals from the motion court's judgment denying, following an evidentiary hearing, his amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence filed pursuant to Rule 29.15.1 We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the judgment of the motion court was not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

All rule references are to Mo. R. Crim. P. 2012, unless otherwise indicated.

Case Details

Case Name: Smith v. State
Court Name: Missouri Court of Appeals
Date Published: Feb 13, 2018
Citation: 539 S.W.3d 931
Docket Number: No. ED 105264
Court Abbreviation: Mo. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.