History
  • No items yet
midpage
Smith v. State
119 Ga. App. 93
Ga. Ct. App.
1969
Check Treatment
Felton, Chief Judge.

The overruling of the motion for a new trial, by being neither specifically appealed from nor enumer*94ated as error, became the law of the case as to the errors therein included, which comprise the enumeration of errors on this appeal from the judgment on the verdict. Tiller v. State, 224 Ga. 645 (164 SE2d 137), and cit. Accordingly, the judgment on the verdict must be, and is,

Submitted January 6, 1969 — Decided January 14, 1969— Rehearing denied January 24, 1969 — Kravitch & Hendrix, Aaron Kravitch, for appellant. Andrew J. Ryan, Jr., Solicitor General, Andrew J. Ryan, III, for appellee.

Affirmed.

Pannell and Quillian, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Smith v. State
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Jan 14, 1969
Citation: 119 Ga. App. 93
Docket Number: 44100
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.