History
  • No items yet
midpage
Smith v. State
43 Ga. App. 353
Ga. Ct. App.
1931
Check Treatment
Bboyles, C. J.

1. The court did not err in refusing the continuance asked for by the defendant. “In all cases the party making an application for a continuance must show that he has used due diligence.” Civil Code (1910), § 5721. In this ease such diligence on the part of the accused was not shown.

2. The excerpts from the charge of the court on the subject of “flight” were not erroneous for any reason assigned.

3. The verdict was amply authorized by the evidence.

Judgment affirmed,.

Luke and Bloodicorth, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Smith v. State
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: May 13, 1931
Citation: 43 Ga. App. 353
Docket Number: 21438
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.