History
  • No items yet
midpage
Smith v. State
108 S.E. 137
Ga. Ct. App.
1921
Check Treatment
Luke, J.

1. The charge of the court was a correct presentation of the law applicable to the facts of the case; and if the defendant desired any fuller or more specific instructions, he should have so requested the court to charge.

2. The evidence authorized the verdict, which has the approval of the trial judge, and for no reason assigned was it error for the court to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Smith v. State
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Jul 12, 1921
Citation: 108 S.E. 137
Docket Number: 12456
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.