History
  • No items yet
midpage
Smith v. State
168 Tex. Crim. 543
Tex. Crim. App.
1959
Check Treatment
DAVIDSON, Judge.

This is a conviction for robbery by assault, with a prior conviction for a like offense. The punishment was assessed at life imprisonment.

*544The victim of the robbery was a service station operator, who testified that about three o’clock, a.m., two persons robbed him of $28 to $30 in money while one of them, whom the prosecuting witness identified as the appellant, exhibited and threatened him with a knife.

Testifying as a witness, appellant denied that he was the robber, and testified to an alibi.

The defensive issue was pertinently submitted to the jury and, by the jury, rejected.

The trial court permitted the state, after the evidence had closed, to reopen its case and introduce testimony the purpose of which was to impeach appellant in his alibi testimony.

Considerable latitude is given to trial judges in authorizing the reopening of the testimony before the case goes to the jury. Such is a matter resting largely within the discretion of the trial court. See: Branch’s P.C., Vol. 1, Sec. 398, p. 420.

There is nothing before us, here, evidencing an abuse of that discretion.

The judgment is affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Smith v. State
Court Name: Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Dec 16, 1959
Citation: 168 Tex. Crim. 543
Docket Number: No. 31,188
Court Abbreviation: Tex. Crim. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.