History
  • No items yet
midpage
Smith v. State
112 Tex. Crim. 136
Tex. Crim. App.
1929
Check Treatment

The offense is operating a pool hall denounced by Art. 653, P. C., 1925; penalty fixed at a fine of $25.00.

The trial took place in the county court upon an information filed by the county attorney. A prosecution upon an information is authorized only when the information is based upon a sworn complaint. See Art. 415, C. C. P., 1925. In the absence of the complaint, the prosecution cannot stand. The judgment of conviction is reversed and the prosecution ordered dismissed. Branch's Ann. Tex. P. C., p. 269, sec. 520; Compton v. State,158 S.W. 515; McDonald v. State, 216 S.W. 166; Thomas v. State,298 S.W. 590; Art. 415, Vernon's Ann. Tex. C. C. P., 1925, Vol. 1, 1928 Annual. Pocket Part, p. 23, note 5.

Reversed and dismissed. *Page 137

Case Details

Case Name: Smith v. State
Court Name: Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Feb 20, 1929
Citation: 112 Tex. Crim. 136
Docket Number: No. 12459.
Court Abbreviation: Tex. Crim. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.