History
  • No items yet
midpage
Smith v. State
243 Ala. 253
Ala.
1942
Check Treatment

Lead Opinion

The bill of exceptions was not presented within the time required by law. It is due to be stricken on motion of the Attorney General filed and presented at the time of submission.

There being no error in the record, the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

GARDNER, C. J., and FOSTER and LIVINGSTON, JJ., concur.

On Rehearing.






Addendum

The time for presenting a bill of exceptions is to be computed according to Title 1, § 12, Code of 1940. Stewart v. Keller, 197 Ala. 575, 73 So. 89.

Title 39, § 184, naming a long list of legal holidays for commercial purposes and found in the Negotiable Instruments Law has no relation to the presentation of the bill of exceptions. They are not dies non juridicus. Belmont Coal R. Co. v. Smith, 74 Ala. 206; 29 C.J. 763, § 5.

Application for rehearing overruled.

GARDNER, C. J., and FOSTER and LIVINGSTON, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Smith v. State
Court Name: Supreme Court of Alabama
Date Published: Jun 11, 1942
Citation: 243 Ala. 253
Docket Number: 8 Div. 150.
Court Abbreviation: Ala.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.