History
  • No items yet
midpage
Smith v. State
282 S.W.2d 876
Tex. Crim. App.
1955
Check Treatment
DAVIDSON. Judge.

This is a - conviction for forgery, with punishment assessed at two years in the penitentiary. ' - .

Under the statute, Art. 979, P.C., an essential element of the crime of forgery is the making “without lawful authority” of a false instrument in writing, purporting to be the act of. another, with the intent to injure or defraud.

The instant indictment contains no allegation that the check described therein, wfiich upon its face purported to be the act of another,-was made “without lawful authority”.

The absence of such allegation renders the indictment fatally defective. Branch’s P.C., Sec. 1403, p. 856; Willson’s Criminal Forms, No. 430; Pye v. State, 71 Tex.Cr.R. 94, 154 S.W. 222.

Accordingly, the judgment is- reversed and prosecution ordered dismissed. ■

Case Details

Case Name: Smith v. State
Court Name: Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Oct 19, 1955
Citation: 282 S.W.2d 876
Docket Number: 27710
Court Abbreviation: Tex. Crim. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.